• About Sasha
  • Books Read By Year
    • 2010 Reads
    • 2011 Reads
    • 2012 Reads
  • Classics Project 2011

Sasha & The Silverfish

~ a reading journal

Tag Archives: Rereading

Letter to my nine-year-old self, on the occasion of my reread of Jude Deveraux’s The Duchess twelve years later

09 Tuesday Nov 2010

Posted by Sasha in Digressions, Marginalia

≈ 5 Comments

Tags

Excerpts, Jude Deveraux, Rereading, Romance Novel

I.

On a whim, I bought a brand-new edition of The Duchess by Jude Deveraux as a 21st birthday gift to myself. The copy you read — mass market paperback, scarlet, an embossed image of a portrait-ed brooch on the cover — has long gone. Somewhere. You haven’t bothered to look.

This book was our introduction to the romance novel. Remember that you read it because you had run out of books in the house? It must have been summer; I knew it was afternoon because I can still feel the heat of the day. You wandered into the spare bedroom. You rummaged through the forgotten paraphernalia on the bedside table: old copies of Reader’s Digests and National Geographics [your grandfather’s subscriptions], a Catcher in the Rye first edition that you tossed aside [even young, you have good taste], a book about maternity wear, some Barbara Cartlands, a Mills & Boon that had a woman in aerobics gear on the cover. And three books by this woman named Jude Deveraux [what a lofty name!] — The Maiden, The Heiress, and The Duchess.

It was The Duchess that you read first. My new copy’s still on the futon [yes, twelve years later you are back to sleeping on the floor -- but do not worry, most nights you sleep with the best man beside you]. You read this book all afternoon. You curled up in the bed, sans sheets, bed springs a-poking and all — the heat was ridiculous, it was. You read, you read. I wish there was some way I could see you as you were that afternoon, that I could walk in on you curled up in that ugly bare bed, you with your large feet and your stubborn curls [you will love your curls soon enough, darling], you so very rapt.

Remember how dismissive you’d been about the bulk of the junk on that bedside table? You’d already read all the Reader’s Digests, dog-eared the “Laughter is the Best Medicine” sections. The other books, you sniffed at. Ah, you snob. You peeked at one Cartland: There was a blonde girl, a cliff, a windy night. This books — and the others — didn’t interest you. They must have been your great-grandmother Ada’s, from when she stayed over. Or maybe even your grandmother, who knows? Certainly not your aunts, you thought then. And definitely not your mother’s. I still don’t know whose Deverauxs and Cartlands those were; I don’t know if I’m ever going to ask.

But you were reading The Duchess. You were in love. With Claire, her intelligence, her curiosity, her occasionally damning innocence — her dreams and disappointments. You were in love with that mysterious stranger, possibly the second fictional man to ever make you blush — the first of course, was Edward Fairfax Rochester, who you’d met months before. You were even in love with this beautiful child named Brat. There were towers and kilts and whiskey and parchment and horses and gowns. And love. Such complex, convoluted love.

You smiled, you sniggered, you gaped. In several pages, a dull ache bloomed in your chest, at the tips of your fingers: Claire crying, Trevelyan’s moods. You’ve felt this ache a number of times before, but it was the first time you felt it while in another person’s world. [There will be more aches like this; you are fortunate.]

II.

You will reread this book twelve years later. I am twenty-one, and I am a very tall girl who still likes to spend afternoons reading. What follows, dear, are my impressions of my rekindled romance with The Duchess — I will try to recount how you felt when you first read this, but know that I won’t try to stifle my feelings this time around. No worries. It is still perfect, no matter how literary-grouchy this 21-year-old has become. Here goes:

Claire Willoughby is an American heiress who will only get — and control — her inheritance if she marries a man her [ridiculously irresponsible] parents approve of. Enter Harry Montgomery, the 11th Duke of MacArran, virtually a perfect man: a bonnie blonde lad in a kilt. They get engaged — because Harry needs the money, and mostly because Claire hears bagpipes whenever she looked at Harry.

Claire is peculiar. As a child, reading her, I was endlessly charmed by her, was always in awe of her strengths and her principles. She is, I know now, the prototype of Sasha Land’s Most Loved Spunk Heroines. She’s this beguiling mix of intelligence and innocence — an intelligence cultivated by [forbidden] books. I know now, too, that she is very flawed, as a person and as a fictional character. She grasps her principles [misguided or otherwise] too tightly at times, even at the risk of losing her happiness. She’s stubborn and occasionally annoying because of this.

But she’s Claire Willoughby. She’s one of my first friends.

And so the Willoughby family travel to Scotland — Claire meets an eccentric cast of characters, in an eerie house. Among them, Trevelyan, who is the epitome of Mysterious Stranger. In the rereading, I realize that they meet in a reversal of the Jane Eyre first meeting: Claire is thrown of a horse and she imperiously sends this pale and gaunt stranger to rescue the animal. I was reunited with Trevelyan.

If Rochester was the first [fictional] man I ever fell in love with, Trevelyan is a close second [with Dorian Grey trailing at third -- do not judge me]. Trevelyan is pretty much perfect, and he has remained perfect to me all these years. For me, he set the bar for all compelling-and-brooding romance novel heroes thereafter. He’s broody and grumpy, intelligent and enigmatic, surly and just the right kind of dangerous. He’s an affective mix of little-boy-lost, bitter-old-man and just plain Yumminess.

A strong bond develops between Trevelyan and Claire, one built on friendship. They’re both two very lonely people — both of them strangers in an eerie Scottish castle so backward in its ways, so despotic in its principles. It’s this loneliness that’s a driving force to their many meetings, even decisions. They’re drawn to each other for companionship, for conversation. In Trevelyan, Claire finds someone to talk to, a “stranger” with whom she can share every aspect of her life. In Claire, Trevelyan finds a person unafraid to challenge his views, even his work — someone direly needs to pierce his Broody Self.

This is a romance novel, and so a romance blooms between these two. Never mind that Claire is engaged, and is resolute that she loves Harry. Never mind that Trevelyan is set on leaving, and is certain that he is not the right man Claire needs. Oh, angst!

It is imperative that they fight the attraction; there’s too much at stake: Claire’s future, Trevelyan’s freedom; the meddling of the evil-incarnate Dowager Duchess, Trevelyan’s explained-later hatred of the Montgomery clan. Older now, I could scream at the book: Relent, dammit, relent!

“I don’t know what to do,” she said. “Tell me what to do.”

Her turned her around to face him and stared into her eyes. “You have to make your own decision I won’t make it for you. No once can live another person’s life.”

It wasn’t what she wanted to hear. Why couldn’t he be like other men and tell her that he loved her, that he wanted her? Why couldn’t he say that he’d kill her or Harry or both of them if they so much as looked at each other again?

There is a constant undercurrent of sensuality. Of course. What could the nine-year-old Sasha have thought when an undecipherable look passed between these two? What went through her head when Trevelyan flirted so carelessly, if only to tease Claire into abandoning her occasional prudish countenance? Even her conviction that it was Harry she loved?

Who knows anymore? But one thing is certain: This 21-year-old swooned.

Perhaps one of the most telling facet of this entire experience is that there is that one scene that has stuck with me forever. So that whenever someone asks me why I read romance novels, it is this scene that springs to mind. A scene that this 21-year-old can recite verbatim. A scene that, upon rereading, is exactly as I have remembered it all these years:

Although she knew it was wrong, although she told herself she shouldn’t—couldn’t say another word, she heard herself whisper, “Vellie.” It was the smallest whisper in the world, so quiet, so soft that the breeze in the trees overhead completely covered it.

But Trevelyan heard it. One second he was what seemed to be miles away from her and the next he was in her arms and his lips were on hers.

The walls have stayed with me, the chill of that night. The trees overhead, Claire’s dress, Trevelyan’s hair. That whisper, the relenting. Goodness.

But. Ah, but. As happy as this rereading already is, as fulfilling as all this has been, I can’t be blind to the fact that this book is no longer technically perfect. I may have gained plenty from this rereading — joy, renewed love for the genre, tearful and uplifting nostalgia — but it cannot be ignored: This is a flawed book.

Particularly the last third of the novel, which direly needs to be scrapped, rewritten. It’s a hodge-podge of tidily tied loose ends, grudges too-neatly settled, useless last-minute additions of secondary characters, villains hastily stowed away with nary a peep. Not to mention the most frustratingly unsatisfying and befuddling epilogue I’ve ever read. It was such a hot mess. There were other ways to conclude this novel. Other ways to ensure a fool-proof Happily Ever After. But Deveraux, it seems, let the story get away from her. She very nearly gave me a reason to hate Claire forever — at the penultimate page, I was verra convinced that she didn’t deserve Trevelyan’s love, I was ready to denounce her. Did this all left me bereft twelve years ago? Granted, I am glad it’s a happy ending. But couldn’t Deveraux have cemented the perfection in my head? Well?

I have to calm down. The previous two paragraphs hurt. But I’m letting them stand not only because they’re true, but also because I wrote them long after I am convinced of my undying devotion to this book.

But, bottom line: Flaws and all, The Duchess remains as one of my favorite novels, of any genre. I will always love it. I will forever be indebted to it. It single-handedly transformed a young snob into a lifelong reader of romance novels. This is one of the most priceless books in my shelves.

There’s this deep-seated joy and contentment that I reread this book. Well, it’s actually more a reunion than anything else.

To that nine-year-old girl with a head of rioting curls and large feet, Good job, darling. That sultry afternoon with that yellowing paperback was only the beginning of so many beautiful things.

What I’ve Been Reading, October 01 – 10

11 Monday Oct 2010

Posted by Sasha in Marginalia

≈ 14 Comments

Tags

Art & Illustrations, Emma Donoghue, Excerpts, Fiction - Novel, Gabriel Garcia Marquez, Jimmy Liao, Nicholson Baker, Rereading, Translation, Zoë Heller

Hello, all. I’m back. Largely an emotional cripple — have grown a tendency to yell at objects zooming past, a soft spot for all things lint-y, sobs at the drop of a hat, too much talking to self. Well. I’m taking a stab at this blogging thing again. I need the structure, oddly enough. So. Here are the books I read while I was away:

  • The Anthologist, by Nicholson Baker.
  • The Believers, by Zoë Heller.
  • Room, by Emma Donoghue.
  • The Blue Stone, by Jimmy Liao.
  • Love in the Time of Cholera, by Gabriel Garcia Marquez.

[I feel rather rusty at this thing. In a Ooh, what does this button do? kind of way. If you're still here, I'd appreciate it if you'd, ah, bear with me. We're shaking things up a little here in these parts. Not only because I feel rather broken right now -- beyond heartache, I am essentially lazy.]


Kicked off the month with some Nicholson Baker. I wanted to read The Anthologist because I felt that it was  imperative that I read it, given it was sending off aggressive Sasha Book signals. And Yay for the trade paperback ed finally reaching this shores. And I loved the book. Everything about it, lovely. Especially the sensational and oh-so-helpful advice on writing, and life:

If you feel that you have a use, if you think your writing furthers life of truth in some way, then you keep writing. But if that feeling stops, you have to find something else to do. Or die, I guess.

Words to live by, haha. I love the narrator, Paul Chowder, his digressions, how charming and scatterbrained he is — how earnest, how loyal to his craft, and yet so terribly undisciplined. A poet tasked to write an introduction to an anthology of rhyming poetry! And it just cannot be done. At the risk of the detriment of his interpersonal skills, his safety, his financial situation, his personal hygiene — he has to write this introduction. But Chowder, oh Chowder.

It’s got this lighthearted tone, pretty deceptive. Mostly because when Chowder comes up with something awesome, you’re blown away. Like saying that poems are our “designated grievers,” or that poetry is “a controlled refinement of sobbing.” Sigh.

Loved it. The manifestos on life, the senseless rambling, the dread in this reader [wondering if he'll actually get to finish this 40-page introduction]. I didn’t expect it to be such a fun, easy read. One full of heart. And the strangest poetry lessons ever.

I followed that bucket of Yum with a thick hardcover of ridiculously Eww characters. What is wrong with me? Especially considering that I have actually read The Believers before: A few months ago, I wrote, “It seems priggish to say that I liked this book intellectually — cerebrally.” Well. Which is to say that I absolutely loathed the characters, their inner lives, how they treated each other, how they treated themselves. Which is to say that I really do admire Heller for being so incredibly gutsy. The thing is, this time around, the hate got the better of me, and I was thinking, [as I'm supposed to, I guess], why the hell I was reading this book. Again. And still. Goodness, these are some of the most annoying people ever. I seriously want to reach in and hit them. I’m actually surprised that there’s very little physical violence in this story, given all these terrible people.

With the rereading, the questions: Isn’t this starting to look all too caricature-ish, how extreme these people are? And, considering that, isn’t this, essentially, such a pedestrian book?

When I finished reading it, I felt really guilty and dirty. Asking myself why I spent so much time with really terrible people. Huh. And I actually scribbled this: Now that I’m sure I really don’t like The Believers, I guess this makes me even less cool. Heh.

And then I got my salary. Which means I attacked a bookstore. Now, Room. Room. I pretty much ignored this year’s Booker Prize — I’ve never been the kind of reader to follow prizes religiously, and the blame’s partly due to, hell, can’t afford those books. And besides, I’m not interested in reading something for the sake of reading it. But, Room, I really wanted to read Room, and so an hour or two after I bought it, I read it, and then I spent the rest of the night reading it. It’s a surprisingly easy read, fast-paced. It was verra good and impressive while I was holding it in my hands. The logic within that 11×11 space, particular to Ma and our Jack’s circumstances, to five-year-old Jack’s mind. The manipulation of the language. The very premise of the book, actually.

But, well, although I did love it while I was reading it, it doesn’t quite reverberate post-read. Especially since its flaws were more visible to me, that they weren’t hazed over with the pacing, and Jack’s character. I’m too blargh at the moment to go into detail as to what I liked and what didn’t sit so well with me in the writing and in the story, but perhaps some other time? Maybe in another post I’ll share many many many spoilers just so I can senselessly prove a point about a book everyone has read every which way anyway? Maybe when I’m not giving y’all sass?

And then, well, I picked up Love in the Time of Cholera, which has been languishing in my bookshelves ever since I rushed out to buy it after falling in love with the movie version. It began, a joy: It was inevitable: the scent of bitter almonds always reminded him of the fate of unrequited love. Ah, GeeGee Marquez. I take you for granted. I always think that I will love you when I read you, and when I actually sit down to do so, you prove so goshdarned difficult to read. Well. Maybe I shouldn’t blame it all on you. There were, after all, wakes to hold vigil in, and a funeral sun to march under. This book, so dense, so lush. But, really, so lovely. It became a chore at some point, but I trudged on, and I’m glad I did it. It is a lovely book. And now I have bragging rights. [Oh, and another factor of the trudging -- this is a mass market paperback edition. I hate mass market paperbacks. I feel the weight of the world on my shoulders when I try to read a poorly bound book, trying not to crease the spine, grimacing at the cheap paper and the mussed fonts.]

Before I actually finished reading GeeGee up there, I read — and gasped and sniffled and smiled tremulously over — Jimmy Liao‘s The Blue Stone. I knew of Liao through a National Geographic documentary, methinks. I couldn’t find his The Sound of Colors, a book I’d long wanted to give my boyfriend, but I found this one slow day at a bookstore. I couldn’t believe it. I didn’t think twice, just bought it. And before I handed it over to my boyfriend, of course I had to read it. The story of a blue stone’s journey, his life, his longing for home — it was the most perfect book to read, at the most perfect time. It was just right. I needed to read something so simple, so heartfelt, something relevant, to boot. And I found it in Jimmy Liao. And I’m very very glad.


So. How are you all? Me, peeking out every so shyly from under the bed, and have shaken a piece of Cheetos or two off my hair.

 

marginalia || Jane Eyre, by Charlotte Bronte – pt. 03

27 Thursday May 2010

Posted by Sasha in Marginalia

≈ 12 Comments

Tags

Charlotte Brontë, Classics, Excerpts, Fiction - Novel, Rereading

Most true is it that “beauty is in the eye of the gazer.”  My master’s colourless, olive face, square, massive brow, broad and jetty eyebrows, deep eyes, strong features, firm, grim mouth,—all energy, decision, will,—were not beautiful, according to rule; but they were more than beautiful to me; they were full of an interest, an influence that quite mastered me,—that took my feelings from my own power and fettered them in his.  I had not intended to love him; the reader knows I had wrought hard to extirpate from my soul the germs of love there detected; and now, at the first renewed view of him, they spontaneously arrived, green and strong!  He made me love him without looking at me.

Beyond the hints at more ominous secrets, the little heartbreaks at faux-fiancée Blanche Ingram, beyond news of illness from what used to be home, so very long ago–I still linger on the romance between Jane and Rochester. That part where Rochester comes to Thornfield Hall after what seems like the longest time to Jane? And it looks like he’s ignoring her, it looks like he’s favoring Blanche over Jane–and Jane keeps telling herself to stop thinking about Rochester, not in that way, dammit woman, get a hold of yourself–that kind of thing? And that part where Jane leaves the most unpleasant rich-people-party evahr, and Rochester chases after her, and he’s funny and he’s asking how she is, and there’s that sternness again, that reluctant sweetness? That one? Where he demands that she go back in there, and Jane’s all like, Hell no I’m tired, and he’s like looking at her for a long-ass time and observes, You sad or something? And Jane stammers and denies anything that has to do with sadness and him, and Rochester’s like, Tell me, and then he’s like,

“But I affirm that you are: so much depressed that a few more words would bring tears to your eyes—indeed, they are there now, shining and swimming; and a bead has slipped from the lash and fallen on to the flag.  If I had time, and was not in mortal dread of some prating prig of a servant passing, I would know what all this means.  Well, to-night I excuse you; but understand that so long as my visitors stay, I expect you to appear in the drawing-room every evening; it is my wish; don’t neglect it.  Now go, and send Sophie for Adèle.  Good-night, my—”  He stopped, bit his lip, and abruptly left me.

Edward Fairfax Rochester bit his fucking lip. Swoon x Infinity. Aherm. I know that if I were a self-respecting book blogger, I would share my thoughts on how the existence of Bertha Mason is slowly being revealed to us, how there’s this wonderful little sub-plot about Rochester and Jane and that beast Blanche Ingram. But man. I am not a self-respecting book blogger then. Hee.

[The Rereading Jane Eyre series: PART 01: Returning to Jane Eyre's world. Remembering what has been forgotten, & especially the things you never knew you even forgot. PART 02: More on reunions--"I am older than Jane Eyre." And the first months of Jane's life at Thornfield Hall.] [Up next: The First Man I Ever Loved--you know I am talking about Edward Fucking Rochester, kids.]

marginalia || Jane Eyre, by Charlotte Bronte – pt.02

24 Monday May 2010

Posted by Sasha in Marginalia

≈ 12 Comments

Tags

Charlotte Brontë, Classics, Excerpts, Fiction - Novel, Rereading

[For those inclined, here's Part 01 of the Rereading Jane Eyre series, which talks about: This long-awaited reunion. Things I've forgotten, things to remember. And, re the book itself (hee), Jane Eyre's childhood.]

I have realized that I am now older than the Jane Eyre that most appears in the novel. I am twenty-one. [Present] Jane might be, say, 28-29 when she tells her tale, but it is the life of eighteen-year-old Jane that we are immersed in. I am older than Jane Eyre. My god, I am older than Jane Eyre. This used to be so unfathomable to me, the nine-year-old who first picked it up, curiosity peaked by the words love and happiness on the back cover. [Even young, we recognize the words.]

I know that when I was younger, I only thought of Jane as someone through which I could experience the world, this world. There’s a calmness to Jane that I’d once mistaken for passivity. I thought that Jane and I were interchangeable while I was reading the novel. I don’t know how things changed, or even why they did, but Jane Eyre is definitely someone else now. A person, someone who’s invited me over for tea and crumpets, and has granted me the privilege of listening to her words.

Virginia Woolf wrote about Brontë: “As we open Jane Eyre once more we cannot stifle the suspicion that we shall find her world of imagination as antiquated, mid-Victorian, and out of date as the parsonage on the moor, a place only to be visited by the curious, only preserved by the pious. So we open Jane Eyre; and in two pages every doubt is swept clean from our minds.” One of the truest things I know at the moment, friends. When I decided to pick up the novel, I really did doubt: What if I was just a starry-eyed girl when I last read and loved this? What if I’d only convinced myself that it was a lovely book, because of what everyone seems to say about it? What if it bores me? What if I cannot find that passion that I’d once squealed at? What if–gasp!–I wanted to kick Rochester where the sun don’t shine, for whatever reason?

Continue reading »

marginalia || Jane Eyre, by Charlotte Bronte – pt.01

23 Sunday May 2010

Posted by Sasha in Marginalia

≈ 13 Comments

Tags

Charlotte Brontë, Classics, Excerpts, Fiction - Novel, Rereading

. . . I believed in the existence of other and more vivid kinds of goodness, and what I believed in I wished to behold.

An Introduction. Of Sorts. — What follows is, I am afraid, a rather self-indulgent post. I have reread what has to be my favoritest-est book ever. I have loved this book since I was nine years old. I am now almost twenty-one. In those years, I have read and reread this book some four to five times—in varying degrees of absorption. [That is, some times I’d simply look for the passages that have stayed with me brightest, and sometimes I’d mouth the words as I read them.]

And now, in my first rereading in approximately, horrifically, five years—Jane Eyre [by Charlotte Brontë] has changed in ways that I couldn’t have foreseen. Five years is a long time to return to what you claim to love most. We are both different beings now, this book and I.

It’s about damned time I returned to the book, about time that I returned to Jane’s head, to Thornfield Hall, especially, to witness what this life holds—a life I don’t even remember very clearly. Oh, I remember the “good” parts. And I don’t even know if they stuck to me because they were vital to the story, or they just appealed to me at some visceral level. A re-discovery was in order. [And though I've always planned to venture into this re-discovery, it took the prodding of Jessica of Read, React, Review and her “Return to Romance Roots” for me to, well, to nut up.]

I’ve discovered that, although things have stayed with me, there are many that I forget. And the more I re-immersed myself in Jane Eyre’s life, things are coming back to me—and they’ve acquired peculiar tints: I think I know you, but I am willing to be patient to make sure. Or, more accurately, I recognize you, but you’re not what I remembered.

[The very first time I read Jane Eyre, nine-years-old. The book was a small paperback, pages yellowing, for the cover a dark oil painting of a study or some drawing room, bordered with red--my mother's copy. From that first reading: I remember the wonder at a non-magical Cinderella story. I remember Jane's occasional audacity. I remember the discovery that battlements meant balcony. I remember I liked Rochester. I remember—and who can forget?—Reader, I married him.]

Continue reading »

♣ The Twittering Blog

  • For book synopses, I'm allowed to hang it and just throw you to the wolves over at Wikipedia, aren't I? #lazy ~ 2 weeks ago
  • RT @FSG_Books: (Saving our McLovin jokes for an official announcement) RT @PublishersWkly 'Superbad' Director May Adapt Marriage Plot ht ... ~ 2 weeks ago
Follow @sashasilverfysh

♣ JUNE’S A-COMING!

♣ Categories

  • Book Dump
  • Currently Reading
  • Digressions
  • Elsewhere
  • Marginalia
  • Monthly Wrap-Up
  • Postscript
  • Sunday Salon

♣ Preoccupations

Abandoned / Skimmed Alain de Botton Art & Illustrations Arthur Conan Doyle Books About Books Charlotte Brontë Classics Classics Circuit Depression Elizabeth Hardwick Erotica Essays Excerpts Fiction - Novel Fiction - Novella Fiction - Short Stories Harold Brodkey HarperPerennial History Irène Némirovsky Lorrie Moore Lydia Davis Memoir Metakritiko NYRB Classics Oxford World's Classics Paul Auster Peirene Press Philippine Literature Philosophy Poetry Raymond Carver ReadHard Book Reference Rereading Richard Yates Roland Barthes Romance Novel Science Short Story Month 2010 Short Story Month 2011 Siri Hustvedt The Classics Project 2011 The NYRB Classics Project Translation

♣

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 779 other followers

♣ Subscribe to RSS

RSS Feed RSS - Posts

RSS Feed RSS - Comments

Blog at WordPress.com. Theme: Chateau by Ignacio Ricci.